“The machines are large and heavy. They’re left in the polling places for a few days until a trucking company can pick them up,” Andrew W. Appel, a computer-science professor, testified. “Many of the polling sites are unlocked. Anyone … can open it up and replace the software inside with fraudulent software.”
The trial, in Superior Court in Mercer County, pits voting-rights activists against state election officials. Judge Linda R. Feinberg will decide whether the machines, the Sequoia Advantage, are unreliable and, therefore, unconstitutional, as the activists claimed in a lawsuit.
About 10,000 Sequoia Advantage models are used in 18 of 21 counties. Election officials and the manufacturer, Sequoia Voting Systems of California, say the equipment does its job consistently and accurately. They say New Jerseyans’ votes are recorded correctly.
In court, Appel demonstrated on one of two machines parked before Feinberg’s bench. He looked something like an auto mechanic peering beneath a hood, albeit one dressed in a suit and minus the grease stains.
He picked apart the equipment, patiently answering questions from lawyers and Feinberg. Out came the motherboard and audio kit, and various read-only memory, or ROM, chips. He spoke about firmware, or chips containing data or programs.
A tamperer, he said, has many options.