Court Order for NAACP v Cortes

United States District Court Judge Bartlet of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Rules in Favor of the Plaintiffs is NAACP v Cortes

Proposed Order

Proposed language for the United States District Court of Pennsylvania

Plaintiffs' Motion for Permanent Injunction

Plaintiffs move for a permanent injunction based on evidence presented in an evidentiary hearing on October 28, 2008.

NAACP vs. Cortes Case Ruling

Pennsylvania District Court order granting the preliminary injunction proposed by plaintiffs, Voter Action and the NAACP.

Defendants Response Memorandum of Law

Plaintiffs Reply Memorandum of Law

Declarations and Exhibits of Robert Lee

VanSickle Declaration

VanSickle Exhibit D

VanSickle Exhibit C

VanSickle Exhibit B

VanSickle Exhibit A

Declaration of Sean Dorn

Declaration of Raul Arroya-Meddoza

Declaration of John Gideon

Declaration of Stephanie Singer

Declaration of Loree Jones

Declaration of Aaron Zisser

Motion to Intervene

While this motion reads as a motion to intervene on behalf of the plaintiffs, the PA Republican State Committee has informed the court that it is a motion to intervene on behalf of the defendants.

Plaintiffs' Memorandum