Update: Washington State Internet Voting Bill Defeated
by johnbonifaz | Feb 18 2009House Bill 1624 authorizing the Washington Secretary of State, Sam Reed, to begin a pilot internet voting program has died in the House because of the significant financial impact the program would have on counties and individual taxpayers that was not reflected in the original fiscal note. House Committee members became aware of the actual price tag of the program after local voting integrity activists sent documentation on the real costs of internet voting programs in other states. Thanks to John Gideon and Ellen Theisen of Voters Unite for their hard work in creating awareness and taking action on HB 1624. Voter Action will continue to monitor and advocate against internet voting legislation being proposed across the country.
A New Threat to the Integrity of Our Elections: Washington State Weighs the Introduction of Internet Voting
In early 2009, fueled by a desire to streamline military and overseas voting, many states across the nation introduced internet voting bills in their legislative sessions. Washington Secretary of State Sam Reed also actively pursued implementation of an Internet voting pilot program for military and overseas voters. Reed’s proposal, presented in the Washington House of Representatives and Washington State Senate, would have allowed for military and overseas voters to cast their votes through a website using their own laptops, which would mark the first such voting system in the country. The bills eventually died in the House because of the significant financial impact the program would have on counties and individual taxpayers that was not reflected in the original fiscal note.
Voter Action, and other major election integrity organizations, have joined leading computer scientists in expressing deep concern about the threat posed to our democracy by the introduction of a voting system that creates serious election vulnerabilities. We believe there are safer and more secure ways to address the issues facing military and overseas voting without undermining the integrity of the very votes that we are hoping to protect.
Internet voting is unreliable. With Internet voting, it would be impossible to ensure the accurate counting of votes as cast. Given the absence of any voter-marked paper ballots, an Internet voting system would prevent any meaningful recount or audit from being conducted. The recent recount of the 2008 US Senate contest in Minnesota between Democratic candidate Al Franken and Republican candidate Norm Coleman highlights the value of a voter-marked paper ballot system where ballots reflecting voter intent can be subject to review.
Internet voting is insecure. An Internet voting system presents serious security concerns. Such security concerns led the Pentagon, in 2004, to cancel Internet voting for as many as 100,000 military and overseas voters from seven states, including Washington. There is now overwhelming evidence that electronic voting machines do not meet basic security standards. Top computer security experts across the country agree that the security problems associated with Internet voting would be exponentially greater than the current problems associated with electronic voting machines.
Internet voting undermines the secrecy of the ballot. The Washington State Constitution makes clear that voters have the right to "absolute secrecy" of their votes. Washington State Constitution, Article VI, Section 6. Under the proposed legislation, military and overseas voters would be issued pin numbers to access a website for casting their votes, thereby creating unique and identifiable markers on ballots cast via the Internet. Such markers could be traced back to the individual voters either by the state or by a private party hacking the system, erasing the state constitutional guarantee of absolute secrecy of the vote.
There is an alternative way to improve the voting system for military and overseas voters that does not compromise the integrity of our elections. Military and overseas voters could apply electronically for a paper ballot which they could print from a government website. This would expedite access to such ballots and would address the problem military and overseas voters face when their ballots do not arrive on time in the mail. While such voters would still need to return their ballots via the mail, the concerns around reliability, security, and ballot secrecy associated with Internet voting would not be presented.



